Skip to content

Case Study: 14 Wa In Fong East, Sheung Wan

Proposed business: 450 sq ft Japanese-Cantonese fusion restaurant
Location: 14 Wa In Fong East, Sheung Wan
Price band: Mid HKD 60–90
Service model: Dine-in (convenience)
Target customers: Office Workers, Local Residents, Foodies/Expats
Coordinates: 22.28294°N, 114.1509°E
District: Central & Western


Demographics — Central & Western District

Section titled “Demographics — Central & Western District”
243K
District Population
HK$30K
Median Monthly Income
21,500
Density per km²
70%
Working-age (18–64)

Source: Hong Kong 2021 Population Census, CENSTATD


Within 800m of 14 Wa In Fong East, FEHD licensing data shows:

Licence TypeCountNotes
Restaurant Licence (RL)42Full restaurants
Restricted Food Permit (RR)18Light refreshments, take-away
Marine Restaurant (MR)1Floating restaurant nearby
Total61High competition zone

Nearest competitors (top 5):

  1. Sheung Wan Cha Chaan Teng — RL, 45m, est. 60 covers
  2. Central Japanese Set Lunch — RL, 120m, est. 40 covers
  3. Morrison Café — RR, 200m, takeaway
  4. Pacific Coffee — RR, 280m, coffee/light meals
  5. Man Mo Dim Sum — RL, 380m, est. 80 covers

StationDistanceDaily RidershipLine
Sheung Wan380m48,000Island Line
Hong Kong850m110,000Airport Express / West Rail
Central920m95,000Island / Tsuen Wan
HKU1,100m30,000Island Line
Sai Ying Pun600m22,000Island Line

Aggregate 15-min transit catchment: ~150,000 riders/day within 2 stops


  • Central & Western index: 168.5 (base 1999=100, commercial retail)
  • Average rent: HK$180/sqft/month
  • Estimated monthly rent: 450 sqft × HK$180 = HK$81,000/month
  • Rent-to-revenue ratio target: ≤15% (industry benchmark)

  • Crime rate: 33.9 per 1,000 residents
  • Total crimes (annual): 8,240 in Central & Western
  • Breakdown: 1,200 violent, 4,800 theft/burglary, 2,240 other

Safety score: 75/100 — above average for commercial districts


ParameterValue
CuisineJapanese-Cantonese Fusion
Floor Area450 sq ft
Covers~25 seats
Price BandMid HKD 60–90
Peak hoursLunch 12–2pm, Dinner 6–9pm
ServiceDine-in (convenience style)
TargetOffice workers + expats

β = 0.8 (convenience dine-in, exponential decay)

Huff Model
P(i→j) = Sⱼ · dᵢⱼ⁻β / Σk(Sₖ · dᵢₖ⁻β)
Probability that a consumer at location i chooses destination j

Our attraction score:

  • Floor area score: 6.5/10 (450 sqft, small but focused)
  • Cuisine uniqueness: 6/10 (Japanese-Cantonese exists but not dominant in 400m)
  • Combined attractiveness Sⱼ = 6.3

Result: 18.4% market capture probability

This means of all dining decisions made within the catchment zone, ~18% are predicted to choose this location — above the baseline of 1/61 = 1.6% that pure randomness would predict.


Estimated daily customer flow: 420 potential customers

Gravity Model
Tᵢⱼ = k · (Oᵢ · Dⱼ) / dᵢⱼ^β
Where Oᵢ = population × income factor × dining frequency
ZonePopulationDining PoolEst. Flow
0–400m (5 min walk)~36,50015% × income factor185
400–800m (10 min walk)~101,70025% × income factor142
800m–2km (transit)~147,60035% × income factor78
2km+ (destination)~104,80025% × income factor15
Total420

k = 0.001, income_factor = 1.2 (above-average district income)


5-min walk (400m radius):

  • Population: ~36,500 residents + daytime office workers
  • F&B competitors: ~31 venues
  • Key features: Sheung Wan MTR 380m, Hollywood Road antique shops, PMQ

10-min walk (800m radius):

  • Population: ~101,700
  • F&B competitors: 61 venues total
  • Key features: Central business district edge, SoHo restaurants

15-min transit (MTR, 2 stops):

  • Sheung Wan → Central: 95K daily ridership
  • Sheung Wan → Sai Ying Pun: 22K daily ridership
  • Transit catchment: ~167K daily MTR users within 2 stops

Function: Exponential, β = 0.8

Distance Decay (Exponential)
f(d) = e^(-0.8·d)
Convenience dining: most customers within 400m, sharp drop beyond 800m

At β=0.8 (exponential), 73% of foot traffic comes from within 400m. This suits the cha chaan teng / fusion lunch crowd — they don’t travel far, but they come daily.

For comparison: a destination fine-dining restaurant (β=2.0, power) would draw more from 1km+ but rely on less frequent visits.


67
Overall Score /100
22/30
Market Size
8/25
Competition
17/20
Transport
CategoryWeightScoreWeightedNotes
Market Size307322High density, good income
Competition2532861 restaurants in 800m — very high
Transport208517Sheung Wan MTR 380m, 48K/day
Safety10758Crime rate 33.9/1000, above avg
Rent Value157812HK$81K/mo rent, manageable at peak
Total10067Above average

Regression Model
Y = −50,000 + 80·450 + (−200)·61 + 0.5·291,919 + 15,000·0.85
Predicted annual turnover = HK$2,076,000/year

Predicted Annual Revenue: HK$2,076,000
Predicted Monthly Revenue: HK$173,000/month
Rent coverage ratio: HK$81K / HK$173K = 46.8% — tight but not impossible

Industry benchmark: rent ≤15% of revenue is healthy. At 46.8%, this location requires:

  • High seat turnover (3+ turns/lunch)
  • Premium menu execution
  • Strong dinner service to offset day rent

📊Location AssessmentPROCEED WITH CAUTION

14 Wa In Fong East scores 67/100 overall — above average for HK. Strengths: excellent transport links (Sheung Wan MTR 380m), high foot traffic, above-average district income. Weaknesses: extreme competition density (61 restaurants within 800m), very high rent (HK$81K/mo), and rent-to-revenue ratio of ~47% at predicted volumes. Viable only with strong differentiation, high turnover, and lunch-dominant model.

Recommended strategy:

  1. Lunch specialization — set menus HKD 68–88, fast turnover (30 min target)
  2. Pre-order/reservation system — capture office pre-orders for guaranteed covers
  3. Weekend destination dining — higher-margin Japanese courses on Sat/Sun
  4. Delivery partnership — Deliveroo/Foodpanda for 20% incremental revenue


This was a static worked example. The live analyzer runs the same models in real-time for any HK address.

→ Analyze Your Location